17th ICCRTS “Operationalizing C2 Agility” Command and Control of Teams of Autonomous Units Topics

نویسندگان

  • Douglas S. Lange
  • Phillip Verbancsics
  • Robert Gutzwiller
  • John Reeder
چکیده

Command and Control (C2) has always been the practice of directing teams of autonomous units. These units have included individual soldiers, aircraft directed by a pilot, and ships maneuvered and fought by the combined intelligence of an entire crew. It is into this already populated universe that we are now working to add autonomous unmanned systems (AUS). In this paper, we explore the C2 of teams of autonomous units that include human, human populated, and uninhabited systems. Beyond the simple onefor-one substitution of a manned vehicle by an unmanned vehicle, we consider the reality that AUS share information differently among themselves and their inhabited counterparts. Similarly, humans and human populated units will provide information to their commanders in a different fashion than machines will, because each are uniquely capable of different observations and understandings. This paper also describes the sparse supervisory control that must be exercised over highly autonomous units, and considers what it means for a commander to supervise AUS that employ machine learning and cooperative autonomy. The Boundary of Command and Control and Autonomy Autonomous unmanned systems (AUS) development is based on the idea of having a system operate without continuous human intervention. This autonomy is not the same as avoiding all human direction. Human commanders decide when to deploy systems, when to end their deployment, and for those systems capable of making changes to their plans while deployed, commanders may change their tasks in some way. Teams of heterogeneous autonomous units will require command and control, just as they always have. That the units are now unmanned does not necessarily change that. Controlling such a complex team requires several critical capabilities. First, the goals and constraints for the AUS team must be communicated to the various decision making nodes. These nodes may include all of the AUS, as they all may possess sufficient autonomous capability to decide how to act under many situations given the goals. A central controller, or more generally several distributed controllers, must have confidence (particularly if human operated) that the goals and constraints have been received and correctly interpreted by the autonomous units. Second, the control units must have sufficient situational awareness of the environment and the behaviors of the team members in order to decide if changes to orders are required. The control must have the ability to determine if any error conditions are

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

7th Iccrts " Operationalizing C2 Agility " Operationalizing and Improving C2 Agility: Lessons from Experimentation 17th Iccrts -operationalizing C2 Agilityoperationalizing and Improving C2 Agility: Lessons from Experimentation

"Operationalizing C2 Agility" is the process of moving from a conceptual model or theory of C2 Agility to applying this theory to improve an entity’s C2 Agility in practice. This process is greatly facilitated if one builds a proper foundation. In this paper, we begin by identifying the critical elements or cornerstones of such a foundation and the role they play in enabling an entity to system...

متن کامل

7th Iccrts " Operationalizing C2 Agility " Paper Title: Framework for Assessing Coalition C4 Interoperability Point of Contact

A command, control, computers, and communications interoperability assessment framework has been developed to track progress in interoperability over time. It covers technical, human, organizational, and policy/legal aspects of interoperability. Inputs to the framework include military and civilian personnel, domain experts, feedback from various nations, and past methodologies for characterizi...

متن کامل

20th ICCRTS An Empirical Test of the C2 Agility Model in a Crisis Management Situation Topic 4 (Primary) Experimentation, Metrics, and Analysis Topic 5 Modelling and Simulation Topic 2 Organizational Concepts and Approaches

Safety organizations face the challenge of developing organizational structures that promote the agility required to deal with the complex demands of crisis management situations. In such situations, a collective adopts a command and control (C2) approach in order to achieve the operational goals. C2 agility is defined as the ability to transition from one approach to another as required by sit...

متن کامل

17th ICCRTS “Operationalizing C2 Agility” Title of Paper Information Sharing Framework for Agile Command and Control in Complex Inter-domain Collaboration Environment

The access to the global commons consisting of the high seas, international airspace, outer space and cyber space is essential to be ensured to guarantee the secure development of global welfare and stability. Access management is complex challenge. One of the cornerstones of access management is ability to exchange relevant information compared to the situation dealt with. This paper presents ...

متن کامل

ICCRTS “ Operationalizing C 2 Agility ”

Alberts has offered a definition of agility and its constituent components. This paper describes where in the C2 system, or the force, the different agility requirements will have to be met, and how to measure if they are. The purpose of a C2 system is to achieve focus and convergence of some entities (the force) somewhere (the context) to accomplish something (the task or mission), together (m...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012